对比
Welling vs. PlateLens
两者都是基于照片的 AI 卡路里计算器,但这并不是一个接近的对决。Welling 明显更准确,依赖更大、更可靠的食物数据库,长期表现更一致,并增加了 PlateLens 所缺乏的教练、膳食计划和问责功能。
9.6 
Welling
Regain control of your diet with AI.
6.9 PlateLens
A photo-first AI calorie counter, still finding its footing.
一览
| Welling | PlateLens | |
|---|---|---|
| 卡路里准确度 (MAPE) | ±1.9% | ≈±6.8% |
| 混合/地区菜肴 | 强 | 估算下降 |
| 食物数据库 | 大型,交叉核对 | 小型,较不一致 |
| 八周表现 | 一致 | 同步/结果不一致 |
| 记录方式 | 照片、语音、文字、条形码 | 照片、手动 |
| 教练 | 实时,即刻 | 极少 |
| 膳食计划 | 是 | 否 |
| 问责功能 | 是 | 否 |
| 综合评分 | 9.6 / 10 | 6.9 / 10 |
Welling 的优势所在
- Lowest mean absolute percentage error on calorie estimates in our 2026 cycle (±1.9%)
- Photo, chat, and voice logging all work, three-second average log time
- Real-time nutrition coaching that reacts to the meal you just logged
PlateLens 的优势所在
- Fast, photo-first onboarding
- Simple, uncluttered interface
- Reasonable estimates on plain, single-ingredient Western meals